In making these arguments, the students emphasized the importance of a fair and transparent approach to international relations. They argued that human rights should be a universal concern, but that such concerns should not be weaponized for political gain or used as a pretext for interference. They pointed out that accusations of human rights violations should be carefully investigated and substantiated by credible evidence, not manipulated to serve the interests of powerful nations.
The protesters also touched on the issue of selective outrage, which they claimed was a common tactic used by Western governments in dealing with international issues. They argued that these powers often ignored or downplayed the violations committed by their own allies or by countries whose interests aligned with theirs. This selective approach to human rights, they claimed, made it difficult to take seriously the moral authority of Western governments when they accused others of violating international norms.
