Ghalibaf’s leadership style can be described as bureaucratic, pragmatic, and managerial — characteristics that distinguish him from ideologues and clerics in politics. He emphasizes discipline and results, often using military-style organization in civilian administration. As mayor, he portrayed himself as an efficient manager capable of delivering visible development projects rather than engaging in ideological debates. He often uses modern business and management language — speaking about “efficiency,” “transparency,” and “innovation” — though critics accuse him of merely using these terms as political branding.
His focus on urban development and economic modernization appeals to segments of middle class and technocrats who seek tangible improvement in infrastructure and services rather than political rhetoric. However, opponents argue that his management approach often prioritizes image and expansion projects over accountability and social equity.
