Tawangari’s defense in the court presents a complex picture of a man who, by his own admission, participated in reprehensible acts but claimed to have done so under a misguided sense of duty. He expressed shame and remorse, suggesting that he had been indoctrinated into believing that his actions were justified as part of a larger effort to protect the country from perceived threats.His defense highlights several themes:Propaganda and Indoctrination: Tawangari suggested that SAVAK’s propaganda had a profound impact on its members, convincing them that their actions were necessary for national security. This reflects the broader strategy of the Shah’s regime to justify its repressive measures as essential for stability and progress.